Singpolyma

There is an RSS Feed for comments on this post.
You can trackback from you own site.

7 Comments

1. Comment at 1164639180//Y-m-d2006-11-27 1164639180//H:i06:53 by Anonymous

   body

   Good show!!

2. Comment at 1164650100//Y-m-d2006-11-27 1164650100//H:i09:55 by Anonymous

   body

   Do I have to do anything? Change any code? Are the changes just on your end?

   Thanks.

3. Comment at 1164659460//Y-m-d2006-11-27 1164659460//H:i12:31 by Singpolyma

   body

   Yes, the code has changed for steps 3 and 5.

4. Comment at 1164739560//Y-m-d2006-11-28 1164739560//H:i10:46 by Anonymous

   body

   Perhaps highlighting where the code changed would be helpful for those of us with bad eyesight.

5. Comment at 1164743880//Y-m-d2006-11-28 1164743880//H:i11:58 by Singpolyma

   body

   For less technically-inclined users it is probably just better to reinstall steps 3 and 5. Or, if they find it necessary, the entire hack. The changes are major enough that simply altering steps 3 and 5 in the existing code is likely beyond the average user.

6. Comment at 1164894120//Y-m-d2006-11-30 1164894120//H:i05:42 by Anonymous

   body

   singpolyma,

   I put your code in the right places (I think). Can you please take a look at this page:

   http://scrappyuntechie.blogspot.com/2006/11/love-hate-for-plaxo-and-linkedin.html

   Why is the link to the first poster's name (Harry M.) a dead link? Where is that URL coming from?

   Thank you.

   Mitch

7. Comment at 1165591920//Y-m-d2006-12-08 1165591920//H:i07:32 by Singpolyma

   body

   That problem has nothing to do with my hack. That is Blogger's code generatnig that. The user entered http://www.whatever.com instead of http://www.whatever.com — creating a broken link.