singpolyma posted, “@codenamebowser yes” @ 2010-051.745Z 4 Responses lxoliva • 2010-051.746Z @singpolyma C; you have permission for X, Y and Z, if you pass them on WRT any source file derived from the original lxoliva • 2010-051.746Z @singpolyma D: you have permission for X, Y and Z, if you pass them on WRT any code in the original program lxoliva • 2010-051.747Z @singpolyma E: you have permission for X, Y and Z lxoliva • 2010-051.748Z @singpolyma see? these are all evidently compatible, without any explicit compatibility clause Leave a Response Name Email Website Comment Authenticate this comment using OpenID. Get replies via e-mail
lxoliva • 2010-051.746Z @singpolyma C; you have permission for X, Y and Z, if you pass them on WRT any source file derived from the original
lxoliva • 2010-051.746Z @singpolyma D: you have permission for X, Y and Z, if you pass them on WRT any code in the original program
lxoliva • 2010-051.748Z @singpolyma see? these are all evidently compatible, without any explicit compatibility clause
4 Responses
lxoliva •
@singpolyma C; you have permission for X, Y and Z, if you pass them on WRT any source file derived from the original
lxoliva •
@singpolyma D: you have permission for X, Y and Z, if you pass them on WRT any code in the original program
lxoliva •
@singpolyma E: you have permission for X, Y and Z
lxoliva •
@singpolyma see? these are all evidently compatible, without any explicit compatibility clause