Did you come here from another social network expecting more?
If there was an ellipse or a shortenend link in the post you saw, then the full content and unshortened link are probably here. Otherwise, sorry, this is the post you just saw.
How can you tell if a link is just a permalink? Well, on microblogging services I use a shortlink ending with /t* at the very end of the post. On long-form services you can probably tell that the title of the link is a complete post instead of just a headline by the way it's written.
Please accept this cute picture as an apology:
12 Responses
Is it 50 in stage 3? It’s kind of odd to allow indoor gatherings of 50 or even 10 and then blame the increases on private indoor gatherings.
via twitter.com
It was 50 inside 100 outside, but changed in late September. Of course gatherings are required to wear masks and distance. (sngpl.ma/t59V3)
via twitter.com
So the govt had no right to blame individuals having private gatherings because 50 people spending hours indoors even with masks and distancing are very likely to get infected if there are positives among them.
via twitter.com
the govt never has a right to blame citizens for collective action failures. Collective action is the govt’s function. (sngpl.ma/t59V4)
via twitter.com
Only in rollback regions
via twitter.com
Wasn’t this afterYork, Peel, TO? Our family outside these areas have been abiding under same.
via twitter.com
@imgrund yeah, ontario.ca/page/reopening… confirms 10 inside 25 outside province wide right now. (sngpl.ma/t59V0)
via twitter.com
We all thought so too…. not that we had any gatherings anyway.
via twitter.com
*has been
via twitter.com
Well let’s hope we don’t need to wait until then! But now wondering if others thought the limits are still 50/100 🤷🏻♀️
via twitter.com
I thought so too on Sept 19 no? news.ontario.ca/en/release/584…
via twitter.com
Yeah, it’s too hard to get people to distance, and the kids don’t enjoy it anyway. I’ll go outside in 2030. (sngpl.ma/t59V2)
via twitter.com