singpolyma posted, “@walkah is statusnet’s implementation of Salmon accepting unsigned messages at all? http://sngpl.ma/t44x1” @ 2010-088.766Z 4 Responses walkah • 2010-088.767Z @singpolyma it sure shouldn’t be Anonymous • 2010-088.775Z @walkah That makes me sad. My impl will be, and I’ll probably start out signing with http://sngpl.ma/p44x0 http://sngpl.ma/t44x2 walkah • 2010-088.784Z @singpolyma well, salmon currently requires slaps to be signed with magicsig… http://code.google.com/p/salmon-protocol/issues/list ? Anonymous • 2010-088.786Z @walkah sure, that’s why I’m going to accept unsigned. I’m not going to implement the MagicSig nightmare. http://sngpl.ma/t44x3 Leave a Response Name Email Website Comment Authenticate this comment using OpenID. Get replies via e-mail
Anonymous • 2010-088.775Z @walkah That makes me sad. My impl will be, and I’ll probably start out signing with http://sngpl.ma/p44x0 http://sngpl.ma/t44x2
walkah • 2010-088.784Z @singpolyma well, salmon currently requires slaps to be signed with magicsig… http://code.google.com/p/salmon-protocol/issues/list ?
Anonymous • 2010-088.786Z @walkah sure, that’s why I’m going to accept unsigned. I’m not going to implement the MagicSig nightmare. http://sngpl.ma/t44x3
4 Responses
walkah •
@singpolyma it sure shouldn’t be
Anonymous •
@walkah That makes me sad. My impl will be, and I’ll probably start out signing with http://sngpl.ma/p44x0 http://sngpl.ma/t44x2
walkah •
@singpolyma well, salmon currently requires slaps to be signed with magicsig… http://code.google.com/p/salmon-protocol/issues/list ?
Anonymous •
@walkah sure, that’s why I’m going to accept unsigned. I’m not going to implement the MagicSig nightmare. http://sngpl.ma/t44x3