Stephen Paul Weberposted, “@dustyweb ICANN may not be the only issue, but they are a big one. The upgrade path Handshake is trying seems very promising.” in reply to @ 2022-1 15:20 UTC
Petnames solve a different problem for sure. *Petname systems* integrate both problems. Handbrake can be pulled in as a naming hub just as DNS can, and same as you and I can.
Handshake maintains compatibility with existing DNS and has a way for existing TLD to move one at a time. Pet names solve a differet problem, right? They cannot solve first contact / discovery. (sngpl.ma/t5G_1)
4 Responses
Petnames solve a different problem for sure. *Petname systems* integrate both problems. Handbrake can be pulled in as a naming hub just as DNS can, and same as you and I can.
via twitter.com
Handshake might avoid ICANN, but it still reintroduces most of the problems I think. But I don’t know what the upgrade path is. Could you link?
(The “naming hubs” and edge names part of the Petname Systems doc I linked provides an upgrade path approach also.)
via twitter.com
Handshake maintains compatibility with existing DNS and has a way for existing TLD to move one at a time. Pet names solve a differet problem, right? They cannot solve first contact / discovery. (sngpl.ma/t5G_1)
via twitter.com
🍄🌼🌈🎮☕🚲💻🪙🐩🥓🛻🇺🇸♓ liked this Article on twitter.com.