Stephen Paul Weber posted, “@aaronmblevin fix code you’re touching as you go?” in reply to @ 2015-161.646Z 2 Responses Aaron Levin • 2015-161.648Z @singpolyma some technical debt cannot be addressed incrementally in that way (or at least that’s the perception), e.g. monolithic -> SOA Originally from: @singpolyma some technical debt cannot be addressed incrementally in that way (or at least that’s the perception), e.g. monolithic -> SOA Jeff Fedor • 2015-161.663Z @aaronmblevin bounded context is your friend Originally from: @aaronmblevin bounded context is your friend Leave a Response Name Email Website Comment Authenticate this comment using OpenID. Get replies via e-mail
Aaron Levin • 2015-161.648Z @singpolyma some technical debt cannot be addressed incrementally in that way (or at least that’s the perception), e.g. monolithic -> SOA Originally from: @singpolyma some technical debt cannot be addressed incrementally in that way (or at least that’s the perception), e.g. monolithic -> SOA
Jeff Fedor • 2015-161.663Z @aaronmblevin bounded context is your friend Originally from: @aaronmblevin bounded context is your friend
2 Responses
@singpolyma some technical debt cannot be addressed incrementally in that way (or at least that’s the perception), e.g. monolithic -> SOA
Originally from: @singpolyma some technical debt cannot be addressed incrementally in that way (or at least that’s the perception), e.g. monolithic -> SOA
@aaronmblevin bounded context is your friend
Originally from: @aaronmblevin bounded context is your friend