If there was an ellipse or a shortenend link in the post you saw, then the full content and unshortened link are probably here. Otherwise, sorry, this is the post you just saw.
How can you tell if a link is just a permalink? Well, on microblogging services I use a shortlink ending with /t* at the very end of the post. On long-form services you can probably tell that the title of the link is a complete post instead of just a headline by the way it's written.
Please accept this cute picture as an apology:
12 Responses
U don’t think parties aren’t entrenched under FPTP??? MMP cannot make it any worse. MMP creates competition 1/
via twitter.com
Any system can be created with open-lists where all candidates face the voters. That’s what we support.
via twitter.com
More opportunities for independents to be elected at local level. MMP & STV are not that different. 2/
via twitter.com
. @FairVoteCanada @singpolyma You appear to be mixing two separate issues. FPTP and ranked ballots are party agnostic.
via twitter.com
. @FairVoteCanada @singpolyma Independents aren’t issue. It is the alleged support for party when someone votes for nominated candidate
via twitter.com
Well, if you believe that, there is nothing to discuss. Parties have used the flaws of FPTP/AV to entrench
via twitter.com
Parties are not the problem. Gotta go. Nice chatting with you
via twitter.com
‘ranked ballots’ aren’t party agnostic – they force a 2 party system. Both winner-take-all for big tent parties
via twitter.com
. @FairVoteCanada @singpolyma To someone who only has a hammer (Gallagher index/etc), everything looks like a nail.#EngagedInER #Frustrating
via twitter.com
. @FairVoteCanada @singpolyma Given you only measure party proportionality, how would you recognize something party agnostic? #EngagedInER
via twitter.com
By the number of effective votes that elect a MP or party. Parties not the problem. 1/
via twitter.com
Parties behave much better in a PR system that they cannot manipulate 2 gain 100% control w/ few swing seats 2/
via twitter.com