People see Java as useful for portability, and slow because it is interpreted, but what about its other features?
Java has more power than any other language I’ve used, except C++, and C++ gives you the wonderful ability to get yourself into trouble really easy, Java has safeguards against all that. So why is practically everyone using something else? You can find APIs and groups for Java, but there seems to be so many more for other, in my opinion inferior, languages.
Tags: Programming Java
Some say the universe is expanding, others say that it is static, but I say the universe is round!
Something cannot, within the physical universe, be infinite. It must have some defined limits. Now God is infinite and could have made the physical universe infinite, and thus some believe. However why did he not then make other infite things. Others say the universe is expaning, and this also is possible. However, I think that the universe is round.
If you take a single dimension (a mathematical line or line segment) and fold it, what do you get? Well, it depends how you fold it. If you fold it into itself, it will become a ray or a shorter line segment. But how about folding onto itself? It will have to gain a dimension so that you can specify where the two parts are in relation to each other, it will have become second dimensional.
The point of this is that I am not claiming the universe is a normal three-dimensional round. I think it is either fourth or fifth dimensionally round. All this means is that we have a way of determining where all points are in absolute relation to each other, but you cannot ‘exit’ the universe and go over the edge. What would be beyond the edge? Nothing? That’s imposible. God then? I think that is silly. I find it much easier to understand what would be outside if we say there is no way to get outside. Which implies infinity or roundness. However we know there is something outside, for there are other universes (that of the angels and heaven and perhaps others). Therefor if we see the universe as round, then we can see these universes as space, inaccesible by any ordinary means. Any means that would allow us to do this would seem to us supernatural, and so it is.
Tags: Philosophy
As AOL kills Netscape, Firefox emerges as the new standard…
Back when Netscape started out, the purpose what to create a free browser that was smaller, faster, and generally better than IE. Not quite so, IE didn’t exist yet, the idea was to be the best, but as time went on that meant to be better than IE. Then, as they gained popularity, they began to attract the attention of AOL. AOL bought the company, phased it out, and now the people who code Netscape are the people who code the rest of the atrocious AOL interface.
Fortunately for us, Netscape started Mozilla before AOL destroyed them. Mozilla holds the ‘rights’ to the Netscape rendering engine and they immidiately built it into a browser. Firefox, the result of these efforts, is now the browser that holds to the original purpose of Netscape. To be smaller, faster, and better, and oh yes, free. As AOL destroys Netscape and turns it into something that isn’t worth looking at (and I mean looking at, the interface is the worst part), Firefox is emerging as the browser. Holding true to the standards-compatability that Netscape practically started (being based on the original Mosaic browser, they almost invented the graphical web) Firefox, for all real purposes, is Netscape, and Netscape is no more. Firefox is what Netscape was, and Netscape is just another AOL product.
Tags: Web Browsers
There are today hundreds of free webhosters, willing to host your site when you don’t have cash, but is it worth the headache?
Want a website, but don’t have the cash to pay $10 a month for a cheap webhoster? Then you’re in the same boat as most people who want a website. Today there are thousands of free tools to help you build your site, but the problem is still where to host it. Even if you don’t mind the ads, what if you need more than HTML? Will your language of preference be supported? Is it worth the headache to find out?
Many people who want a website want it to be easy to find. So the logical option is
50megs.com. With them you can get a free sub-domain following the pattern
yourname.50megs.com. But upon testing this it has been found that the sub-domain service can be buggy, making it actually harder for people to find your site. And if you have a question or want to complain, well, too bad. You can’t write to 50megs tech support (you can’t even find their address!) if you are an unpaid member.
What about
Geocities? Right off the bat they tell you that, although you won’t get a subdomain, you will get support for the filetypes listed. No need to ask questions about extra-HTML coding, which is good because they don’t seem to have a tech support contact either! PHP is supported, but is MySQL? Is there any way to find out? Maybe, but you’ll have to go the long way round to figure it out, because there is not contact information or form for asking questions.
So is it worth the pain? Yes and no. If all you need is a simple HTML-based site, then you can host it without much trouble off of both 50megs and Geocities. It is probably better to mirror on both sites just in case one of them has a problem (which free services are prone to have). If you want anything past HTML you’ll have to go with Geocities (or do your own research, ouch!). However if you have any questions, you cannot ask either site questions. Maybe they like it that way.
There are many other free hosters, but is it worth looking through a whole bunch of little-known sites in hopes of finding one that will do what you want? Hardly. Stick with ones you know, or one of your friends knows, and don’t expect high-quality results.
Edit: I finally got ahold of some ‘tech support’ for Geocities and they do not support PHP or mySQL in the least, thier documentation is misleading. 1ooWebspace seems to be your best bet, with the most features (including PHP and mySQL) and the least advertising (one small Google ad)
Tags: Web Webhosting